Dear MM
Firstly thank you for joining this forum and bringing both your sense of humour, exciting desire to shock, and stimulating thoughts to discussion.
Personally I'm not sure that as yet I understand your first proposition in its analogy entirely; perhaps it's better not to go there, but it's certainly a grabbing headline!
How serious is your assertion that we should have an agnostic area? Being a bit neither one thing nor another I'm not at all sure how exciting it might turn out to be.
Your analysis is certainly on the ball and in view of your starting at both the believing end and from the non-believing end and arriving at the same conclusion, is there really any room for the third corner of the forum that you propose?
Humility . . . obstacle to whatever you like to call it . . . no doubt many will feel that you are hitting the nail on the head.
Best wishes
Forum Admin
Firstly thank you for joining this forum and bringing both your sense of humour, exciting desire to shock, and stimulating thoughts to discussion.
Personally I'm not sure that as yet I understand your first proposition in its analogy entirely; perhaps it's better not to go there, but it's certainly a grabbing headline!
How serious is your assertion that we should have an agnostic area? Being a bit neither one thing nor another I'm not at all sure how exciting it might turn out to be.
Your analysis is certainly on the ball and in view of your starting at both the believing end and from the non-believing end and arriving at the same conclusion, is there really any room for the third corner of the forum that you propose?
Humility . . . obstacle to whatever you like to call it . . . no doubt many will feel that you are hitting the nail on the head.
Best wishes
Forum Admin