News:

If you have difficulty registering for an account on the forum please email antespam@gmail.com. In the question regarding the composer use just the surname, not including forenames Charles-Marie.

Main Menu
Menu

Show posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Show posts Menu

Messages - Max PB

#1
Thank you for your replies.

Young Thomas Mellan certainly enjoys himself at the console, exploring all the different sections.  It's wonderful to see young people getting enthused by such versatile and extraordinary instruments. Only a pipe organ has such a stunning range, and very few of us ever get a chance to play the big ones, and even then, how often do we get a chance to explore the breadth of every stop?  I'm not sure I get the comment on making a pipe organ sound like an electronic one. Maybe it's the fact we don't often hear individual pipes at the extremes - unless we have a diet of Messiaen?

I'll look out for Peter Williams' book on the history of the organ, but my question wasn't so much about the historical angle so much as why did the organ get into church at all?  My proposal is that the organ is not only the best instrument at supporting the rituals of our worship but also it is the best at enhancing our experience.  Sometimes sympathetically to how we were feeling, and sometimes by challenging. Of course this does depend on the organist and on the organ. Both of which are on the endangered list.  But then there are some dreadful pipe organs out there that really should be retired, and if a church doesn't have an organist then what's the point of having an organ? Then we get to the chicken and egg question and whether people want to go to church in the first place.  Too big a subject for this topic I think. So I'll go back to the experience of hearing the organ.

Thank you for the story of people listening to an organist rehearse.  It's always encouraging that some people enjoy listening and certainly in my experience people do often sit for longer than they might have done.  I'm sure some people are driven away mind you, especially those set in their ways who weren't expecting to find company, let alone live music, in the church.

I've been told off by churchwardens for making too much noise while they are trying to tidy up (but you have to practise for Easter morning some time during Lent!) and a member of the congregation shouted at me to stop after a service for playing the Devil's music. Is Langlais really that bad? Poor chap had realised it was Roman Catholic music and the daft church I belonged to at the time had taught its people that only C of E was right and nothing else was to be tolerated.  Still, not much fun trying to get those notes right when someone's standing beside you shouting at you.  Apparently I needed to let the Holy Spirit choose the music - so obviously the Holy Ghost is not French.  Bach didn't offend, curiously enough.

People may not listen to a closing voluntary (it's the signal that says "start talking loudly") but usually in my experience people do stop and listen at other times of day.  People have thanked me for playing "for them" and have asked for more.  An American tourist was ecstatic about the new Klais organ in Bath Abbey after I played something loud. A lady in a Sussex church was very moved by Master Tallis' Testament on a weekday lunchtime following a terrorist attack in London. 

Church cleaners and flower ladies usually love to have music while they work. I do tend to apologise before I start if I'm about to practise something noisy or difficult, but, just as in a service, people seem to prefer contrast and a varied selection.  And then of course a quiet Bach choral doesn't always win against the hoover!

I remember playing in a tiny church in Devon. A single manual instrument. I was practising for a wedding that afternoon and a retired priest came and sat. He asked me to play Appleford's tune for the hymn "Lord Jesus Christ". He wanted all the verses and then thanked me very much. It was one of the hymns for his wife's funeral the day before. I felt very privileged to have been there.

The organ mechanism then jammed on the penultimate chord of the Trumpet Tune I played for the Bride's entrance. Irritating to have an F blasting out for the final chord of C major. So, hands off and quickly shove in the 5 or 6 stops. Music whisked to the organ stool and the front panel of the organ/music desk hurriedly removed and handed to wife/page turner.  Hands inside the organ untangling the mechanism and straightening the rods so they wouldn't get stuck again.  The priest hadn't noticed a thing and carried on with his VERY SHORT welcome and his invitation to sing the first hymn.  The best man had noticed what I was doing and looked very pale. Organ panel back in place, music up, stops out and away with the hymn. Nobody else realised there had been any problem.

Now, you couldn't do that with an electronic!!

All the best,
Max



#2
I'm new to this site and have had a quick(ish) look through topics over the past few days and can't find a section that best fits my own questions and my own passion for the organ in church. So I hope you will forgive me starting a new topic.

Does anyone on this site share my sheer excitement for the church organ?  I'm not takling about numbers of stops or applause after voluntaries, nor wind pressure nor necessarily the mechanical genius of the thing (although I am in awe of the beauty of the mechanical solutions developed over the years, and very aware of the ever-present symbiosis of maths, physics, art and wonder [can symbiosis exist between four things?!]).

But help, I'm getting lost in parentheses already, so can I ask my question? Why did the organ get into the church in the first place?  Was it just to give notes to the choir? Byrd, Tallis, Palestrina, Gibbons, Bull, Tye... did they need an organ? Some of them wrote extensively for the organ, maybe to give the choir a rest. Maybe because there are times in an ancient building at times of ancient ritual where the organ just does the job so much better than anything else available.

The organ is a solo instrument, but more importantly an accompanying one too.  Just as the priest has to lead the congregation, so does the organ. But whereas the priest rarely functions alongside the congregation (controversial statement?) the organist's skill is in supporting and developing everything around him or her. The season of the year, the season of the church, the weather, the life, birth, sickness or death of participants, the aptitude of the choir, the sense of the lessons or the thrust of the sermon. Or the stillness and serenity and hugeness of communion, or the anticipation and preparation before a service. 

The organ can do all these things better than any words or any other instrument in an ancient and resounding building - small organs for small buildings, bigger organs for big buildings. The organist is key to reflecting the occasion and to developing it beyond the capacity of any of the other participants.  There are times for the organ to be silent, and times for grandeur, and calm, and shock. 

Ritual is enhanced by the organ, both through sympathy and by stark contrast.

And all of this is part of a to thousand year old ritual. Always changing. Not always right. But the river of our lives is surely enriched by the organ more than anything else manmade.

is there place in this forum for talking about when the organ has made a difference? or what some of our significant experiences have been as listeners or players?